Re: cygwin copy problems usb 2.0

On Jul 27 13:48, aldana wrote:
>
> isn't there a possibitly that cygwin provides a quicker cp-implementation?
> i mean 4 minutes for a copy of 70MB to a memstick (instead of CopyFile() 20
> sec.) is not really good performance.  
> i guess there is a reason for that...

Right, how did you know?  The reason is that cp is a portable
implementation using simple reads and writes to perform the copy.
There's no such thing as a CopyFile routine on POSIX systems.


Corinna

--
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/