Oh, I forgot to mention that we have another Range interface in
qx.ui.form.IRange which could replace the util range interface. So
removing the interface is just a try to reduce the redundancy in the
framework.
The Range class were used in the 0.7 line of qooxdoo for the spinner
and the progress bar. The 0.8 spinner uses its own, internal range
implementation now. So the only thing using this Range is the progress
bar in the contrib section.
Martin
Am 26.06.2009 um 10:51 schrieb Martin Wittemann:
> Hello,
> we added a bug some time ago discussing whether we still need the
> class and interface in the qx.util.range namespace.
> (
http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2476)
> The namespace contains one interface and one class implementing that
> interface.
>
> - qx
> - util
> - range
> - IRange.js
> - Range.js
>
> Perhaps someone in the community can give us a hint why we should not
> deprecate the class and interface. Do you use this interface / class?
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> qooxdoo-devel mailing list
>
qooxdoo-devel@...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
