WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days.
If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration
on the Nabble Support forum.
Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:52:40AM -0800, Enke Chen wrote:
> Hi, Bruno:
> This is really well said, and I share the same concern:
> And for existing fields, IMHO, this document should be conservative with regards to its
> change on existing specifications. IMHO it should only forbid the use of AS 0 when necessary
> for your new use case).
> So far I have not seen much justifications (nor need) for expanding
> error conditions of AS 0 beyond the AS_PATH / AS4_PATH.
I also agree. I think the text as written tends to violate the Robustness