On 05/04/2012 01:49 PM, Michael D'Errico wrote:
> Was it intentional to leave out the ChangeCipherSpecs that immediately
> precede Finished? I think they still need to be there.
The intent was to move the CCS from late in the handshake to as soon as
practical in the handshake without changing their meaning. So, yes.
Are you saying just the CCS records still need to be there, or we really
should plan to change the cipher a second time? Why?
- Marsh
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
