« Return to Thread: entorhinal cortex
Re: entorhinal cortex
by Peter F-3
::
Rate this Message:
"Matthew Kirkcaldie" <m.kirkcaldie@...> wrote in message
news:m.kirkcaldie-61DAD8.22325727022006@......
> In article <lDULf.6033$Zw.35@...>,
> "Psiclone" <nunya@...> wrote:
>
>> right, i thought alzheimers was a amyloid protien build up, not a trauma
>> induced alpha state so psychic detatchment occurs to prevent painful
>> memories, or whatever, it's late and i may have misread something
>> somewhere.. if so, sorry...
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amyloid
>
> You'd be with the majority of scientific opinion in this view. Truth is
> often the first casualty of UseNet.
>
Dear Matthew,
You sound like someone who is
both conservative and committed to teaching.
Scientific and social progress typically
partly involves that 'crazy' or uncomfortable hypothesizers
and idea-hatchers stick
their necks out.
If I am misinformed about something,
or base my proposals, speculations, and interpretations
of "What Is (actually) going on" on false facts,
then I would not only accept *but be grateful* for
any specific corrective advice.
However, I am afraid that because of some sort of
word-blindness-manifested type of brain-"weakness"
(a problem that seem specific to when I write in English) you will have to
get used to that I trip us (myself and others) up in many of my utterances
on the Usenet. :-<
(Weirdly enough, I seem not to be too bad
at spotting mistakes in other people's
written English.)
Yours duly respectfully,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Neur-sci mailing list
Neur-sci@...
http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/neur-sci
news:m.kirkcaldie-61DAD8.22325727022006@......
> In article <lDULf.6033$Zw.35@...>,
> "Psiclone" <nunya@...> wrote:
>
>> right, i thought alzheimers was a amyloid protien build up, not a trauma
>> induced alpha state so psychic detatchment occurs to prevent painful
>> memories, or whatever, it's late and i may have misread something
>> somewhere.. if so, sorry...
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amyloid
>
> You'd be with the majority of scientific opinion in this view. Truth is
> often the first casualty of UseNet.
>
Dear Matthew,
You sound like someone who is
both conservative and committed to teaching.
Scientific and social progress typically
partly involves that 'crazy' or uncomfortable hypothesizers
and idea-hatchers stick
their necks out.
If I am misinformed about something,
or base my proposals, speculations, and interpretations
of "What Is (actually) going on" on false facts,
then I would not only accept *but be grateful* for
any specific corrective advice.
However, I am afraid that because of some sort of
word-blindness-manifested type of brain-"weakness"
(a problem that seem specific to when I write in English) you will have to
get used to that I trip us (myself and others) up in many of my utterances
on the Usenet. :-<
(Weirdly enough, I seem not to be too bad
at spotting mistakes in other people's
written English.)
Yours duly respectfully,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Neur-sci mailing list
Neur-sci@...
http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/neur-sci
« Return to Thread: entorhinal cortex
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
