« Return to Thread: exception-type-filter with chaining-router

Re: exception-type-filter with chaining-router

by Andrew Perepelytsya :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Consider ComponentBindings. Then your service could orchestrate complex flows.

HTH,
Andrew

On Jul 1, 2009 7:07 AM, "deepan s" <deepans@...> wrote:


Appreciate your quick response.

Thanks Antoine, what you suggested worked.

We have one more query,

Is there a condition based routing mechanism?
Say, i have 3 services (taking same input parameter) to be routed in order.
And the routing should break and return to the caller when some condition
gets satisfied (condition should be evaluated on the response of the service
being called)

We can achieve the same using exception based routing by throwing an
exception with-in each of the service when the condition is not satisfied
(so that the routing proceeds to the next service), but is there a more
elegant way of doing this without throwing an exception?

Regards,
Deepan Subramani.


Regards,
Deepan Subramani

antoine.borg wrote: > > Hello, > > The chaining router does not catch exceptions that are thrown...

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/exception-type-filter-with-chaining-router-tp24267008p24287951.html
Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this lis...

 « Return to Thread: exception-type-filter with chaining-router