« Return to Thread: exception-type-filter with chaining-router
Andrew Perepelytsya wrote:Consider ComponentBindings. Then your service could orchestrate complex
flows.
HTH,
Andrew
On Jul 1, 2009 7:07 AM, "deepan s" <deepans@virtusa.com> wrote:
Appreciate your quick response.
Thanks Antoine, what you suggested worked.
We have one more query,
Is there a condition based routing mechanism?
Say, i have 3 services (taking same input parameter) to be routed in order.
And the routing should break and return to the caller when some condition
gets satisfied (condition should be evaluated on the response of the service
being called)
We can achieve the same using exception based routing by throwing an
exception with-in each of the service when the condition is not satisfied
(so that the routing proceeds to the next service), but is there a more
elegant way of doing this without throwing an exception?
Regards,
Deepan Subramani.
Regards,
Deepan Subramani
antoine.borg wrote: > > Hello, > > The chaining router does not catch
exceptions that are thrown...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/exception-type-filter-with-chaining-router-tp24267008p24287951.html
Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe from this lis...
« Return to Thread: exception-type-filter with chaining-router
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |