Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string

> Marco,
>
> Viewing over your code, and if you updated everything (I think FC5.1 now
> caches the functions, so you need to update after changing them), then it
> should work. If it doesn't work, then my guess is that the problem lies in
> ftSeq.
>
> To debug, maybe try switching the order of the ftSeq just for a test?
>
> Tomek
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Marco van den Oever <
>
> marcovandenoe...@...> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tomek, i replied on:
>
> >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example
>
> > Just to be sure you know, i don't see notifications on comments...
>
> > On Jun 5, 5:09 pm, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...>
> > wrote:
> > > Awesome Tomek, gonna play with it asap :)
>
> > > On Jun 5, 4:57 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote:
>
> > > > already found a problem when no ftDefault value is defined for the
> > boolean.
> > > > Updated code (including javascript to get rid of the label showing up
> > as
> > > > well) is here:
>
> > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example
>
> > > > Tomek
>
> > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...>
> > wrote:
> > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example
>
> > > > > quick editing job, feel free to correct / expand / etc.
>
> > > > > Tomek
>
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > >> Hi All,
>
> > > > >> I wanted to play around with ftWatch and see what I could do with
> > the
> > > > >> displays and such, and extending the two formtools (numeric, string)
> > was
> > > > >> quite instructive. I thought it would be useful to post it here (and
> > > > >> eventually on wiki), since its an easy example of checking whether a
> > boolean
> > > > >> field is being watched, and if so, displaying the input or not
> > depending on
> > > > >> the boolean value:
>
> > > > >>         <cfif structkeyexists(arguments.stMetadata,"ftWatch") and
> > > > >> len(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)
> > > > >>             AND
>
> > structkeyexists(arguments.stObject,"#listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)#")
>
> > > > >>             AND
>
> > isValid("boolean",arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)])
>
> > > > >>             AND NOT
> > > > >> arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)] >
> > > > >>             <cfset html=""/>
> > > > >>         <cfelse>
> > > > >>             <cfset html =
> > super.edit(argumentCollection="#arguments#") />
> > > > >>         </cfif>
>
> > > > >> And similar for display function.
>
> > > > >> Now if only I could get rid of the label for that as well...any
> > ideas on
> > > > >> that?
>
> > > > >> Tomek
>
>