I think it's reasonably obvious that bar isn't the name of a setter for foo.
2009/7/8 Michael <
micha-1@...>:
> Am Wednesday 08 July 2009 10:58:57 schrieb Ricky Clarkson:
>> The setter doesn't have the same name as the getter. "v_" != "v"
>
> yes, it's only that foo and foo_ works, but bar und foo_ doesn't work, so the
> names have to be the same, expect for the underline. But this isn't obvious.
>
> Michael
>
--
Ricky Clarkson
Java Programmer, AD Holdings
+44 1565 770804
Skype: ricky_clarkson
Google Talk:
ricky.clarkson@...