Gert Doering wrote:
...
> Indeed, that would be the necessary change.
>
> I am not following the CVS commit messages - I checked tech-net, didn't
> find anything here, nothing in any of the announcement lists either, so
> I decided to err on the safe side, and bring it up here.
>
> What about a pullup to netbsd-3 and netbsd-2?
>
> gert
>
Hi,
A pullup for netbsd-3 is in the queue as well (1766). I'll start
looking into netbsd-2 hopefully over the weekend. We'll then be
releasing an advisory for the issue documenting the change in behaviour
WRT RH0.
regards,
adrian.
