Hi,
On 15.05.2009, at 23:08, Markus Stürmer wrote:
> Both parties had good arguments there, I think.
well, I have not heard any good (actually none at all) arguments pro-
UUID, contra X-UUID yet.
> Why changing a standard-compliant implementation, only because
> others don't implement it correctly? Why porting software to Linux
> and insisting on a certain approach when there is no client
> supporting it?
Apple does not port the software to Linux :-)
> CalDAV may just be too complicated…
No. CalDAV does not enforce uuid's. Thats a very special thing of the
Apple server. Both, server and client need to deal with any iCal
ATTENDEE ID. Can be UUID, mailto, tel, anything.
> iMiP seems to work fine in both, iCal and Lightning. Is there a way
> of doing that?
>
> Unfortunately I also don't expect sunbird/lighning to support DCS's
> urn schemes soon. It is just not common enough, and they are already
> short on developers. :-(
As of now, there is no way to resolve UUID ATTENDEEs. Its plain
impossible for a client to remap incoming iMIP messages (a UUID is
completely opaque to the client).
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://helgehess.eu/_______________________________________________
calendarserver-users mailing list
calendarserver-users@...
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/calendarserver-users
