Right, sorry if I was misunderstood.
All those technologies are compatible at the OSGi service registry level.
My point was that it's not possible to *implement* blueprint using
iPojo, that's all.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 13:21, Neil Bartlett<
njbartlett@...> wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Of course iPOJO and Blueprint are compatible!
>
> Services exported by a bundle using iPOJO can be imported by a bundle
> using Blueprint, and vice versa. All of these component models --
> iPOJO, Blueprint, DS, Spring-DM, Peaberry etc -- interoperate
> perfectly at the level of OSGi services. Of course they are all
> implemented in different ways internally, but there is absolutely no
> need to force every component model to implement Blueprint.
>
> Regards
> Neil
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Charles Moulliard<
cmoulliard@...> wrote:
>> If iPojo and Blueprint are not compatible. What can we do !
>> This kind of situation is always frustrating for developers/designers and
>> architects because choice must be done between competitors (Spring DM,
>> Blueprint, iPojo, SCA, ...).
>> Our time is precious. This is why having standards in OSG is really
>> important like it is in Java World for J2EE specifications. I'm pretty sure
>> that this kind of situation will not help to promote OSGI as alternative to
>> classical development done on J2EE application servers like Websphere, ...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Charles Moulliard
>> Senior Enterprise Architect
>> Apache Camel Committer
>>
>> *****************************
>> blog :
http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Guillaume Nodet <
gnodet@...> wrote:
>>
>>> When I first started the blueprint implementation, the idea was to use
>>> iPojo and implement blueprint on top of it.
>>> Unfortunately, iPojo and blueprint have very different ways of solving
>>> the same problems, and it seems quite impossible to easily reconcile
>>> those.
>>> So, I don't think there will be any relationship between iPojo and
>>> blueprint.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:19, Charles Moulliard<
cmoulliard@...>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > What are the future plans of iPojo regarding to OSGI specification (= RFC
>>> > 124 ) called Blueprint ? Will iPojo be migrated to be used as blueprint
>>> > services or iPojo will continue to live without integration with
>>> blueprint ?
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Charles Moulliard
>>> > Senior Enterprise Architect
>>> > Apache Camel Committer
>>> >
>>> > *****************************
>>> > blog :
http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog:
http://gnodet.blogspot.com/>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>>
http://fusesource.com>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog:
http://gnodet.blogspot.com/------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...