On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Donny Viszneki
<
donny.viszneki@...> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:42 AM, René Dudfield <
renesd@...> wrote:
>> I'm not a lawyer, but this seems to satisfy the LGPL, and what I've
>> heard of the apple license -- both in spirit and letter of the
>> licenses.
>
> You can distribute a static binary if dynamic binaries and/or your
> source code are also made available. It's not more complicated than
> this.
>
It says you can distribute one if you make your object code available
so that users can link changed LGPL code.
_______________________________________________
SDL mailing list
SDL@...
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org