Re: is_base_of<int, int> behaviour.

John Maddock wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Some time ago we made is_base_of<int,int>::value true, for reasons that
> escape me, and the TR1 followed this.
>
> However, C++0X makes is_base_of<non_class, non_class>::value to be
> false, which seems all round more logical to me.

Not only that but I would have intuitively thought that is_base_of<>
would always be false if either template parameter is a non-class type.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost