Thanks for going to test this Jarek.
It sounds like I would need to being this up with JCP-224 then.
--Kurt
Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Kurt,
>
> I'm pretty sure that's what the spec mandates. I can test this out to
> see if it breaks the TCK signature tests but even if it doesn't you
> might still run into that problem on Java 6 or later since the
> javax.xml.ws API are now provided by the JVM. However, I think you
> could override these JVM API by placing the Geronimo spec jar into the
> JVM's lib/endorsed directory.
>
> I'll test this out and let you know.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Kurt T Stam<
kurt.stam@...> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> On the jUDDI project one of our APIs uses the javax.ws.xml.Holder class
>> (which contains jUDDI specific data classes). We have a requirement to send
>> the entire Holder class over RMI, but Holder is not Serializable. I think
>> this is a short coming of the implementation.
>>
>>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/src/main/java/javax/xml/ws/Holder.java>>
>> If you agree can this be fixed? Or do you believe that the spec dictates
>> this?
>>
>> Thx,
>>
>> --Kurt
>>
>> kstam at apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
