Thanks Jarek,
I'll take it up the JCP.
--Kurt
Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Kurt,
>
> The signature tests fail with this change.... so we can't add
> Serializable to the Holder class.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Jarek Gawor<
jgawor@...> wrote:
>
>> Kurt,
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that's what the spec mandates. I can test this out to
>> see if it breaks the TCK signature tests but even if it doesn't you
>> might still run into that problem on Java 6 or later since the
>> javax.xml.ws API are now provided by the JVM. However, I think you
>> could override these JVM API by placing the Geronimo spec jar into the
>> JVM's lib/endorsed directory.
>>
>> I'll test this out and let you know.
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Kurt T Stam<
kurt.stam@...> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> On the jUDDI project one of our APIs uses the javax.ws.xml.Holder class
>>> (which contains jUDDI specific data classes). We have a requirement to send
>>> the entire Holder class over RMI, but Holder is not Serializable. I think
>>> this is a short coming of the implementation.
>>>
>>>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/src/main/java/javax/xml/ws/Holder.java>>>
>>> If you agree can this be fixed? Or do you believe that the spec dictates
>>> this?
>>>
>>> Thx,
>>>
>>> --Kurt
>>>
>>> kstam at apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
