(Please delete cc to www-rdf-comments if replying on public-owl-dev)
See RFC 4646
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4646.txtobsoletes 3066
But
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Graph-Literal[[
Plain literals have a lexical form and optionally a language tag as
defined by [RFC-3066], normalized to lowercase.
]]
and
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-lang-tag[[
The values of the attribute are language identifiers as defined by [IETF
RFC 3066], Tags for the Identification of Languages, or its successor;
in addition, the empty string may be specified.
]]
Hmmm, seems like a bug in my text in rdf-concepts, the XML text is
better, and refers to 4646
Jeremy
Boris Motik wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Yes, these were meant to be as in RFC 3066. I’ll add a note into the bug
> list, so that we can repair this in course of the standardization process.
>
>
>
> Thanks for pointing this out!
>
>
>
> Boris
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*
public-owl-dev-request@...
> [mailto:
public-owl-dev-request@...] *On Behalf Of *Matthew Pocock
> *Sent:* 03 April 2007 14:12
> *To:*
public-owl-dev@...
> *Subject:* language tags
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The owl 1.1 spec uses languageTag in the definition of typedConstant.
> This isn't referenced anywhere. Are these language tags according to rfc
> 3066, or some other standard? Could we have a link to the relevant spec
> in the document please?
>
>
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3066.html>
> Matthew
>
> (feeling extra pedantic today)
>
--
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
