Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps somebody-not-Mark could write the instructions in CG 1.3,
>> then a Frogmeister-not-Mark could proofread those instructions and
>> add whatever else is needed.
>>
>> If you want to rename the section, go ahead. If you want to
>> suggest a different location fine; I haven't really thought about
>> where to put it. The important thing at the moment is just to get
>> it... I'll be reviewing the CG in a few days, anyway.
>>
>> ... actually, the *most* important thing at the moment is to get
>> into the habit of using the CG, both for writing and reading.
>>
>
> Great points.
>
> It seems to me, though, that there is a time for discussing stuff on the
> mail lists until the answers get settled.
>
> Once the answers are settled, then they should go in the CG.
>
> So I think we're right on the edge of it being time to put it in the CG.
>
> So, Jon, will you be somebody-not-Mark, and I'll be Frogmeister-not-mark?
>
Yep, sounds good. Would you prefer that I send text for review and
then create the patch when we like it, or should I just create a
patch to be reviewed?
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel