On Aug 22, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Jay Levitt wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>> I'd like to ditch rspec's mock framework and let ppl use mocha or
>> flexmock or RR (or others). RSpec's mocking framework doesn't really
>> offer anything above those frameworks, and it's therefore an
>> unnecessary burden to maintain.
> +1! I currently use rspec's mocks because they're the default, but
> I'd
> have no problems switching frameworks. If there's no good reason to
> have our own, let's not have our own.
>
> Jay
>
+1, and +1 to moving things like Spec:UI and Spec:distributed. I
would suggest keeping the literature on mocking, with minor
modifications. The tight integration with mocking, and the pushing
the ideas in the literature is what got my team and I to use it. The
current Rails literature really only shows mocks as a way to mock out
an external project, but I think it is good to use it to isolate
tests as well. I think that is proper BDD, too.
JIm
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
>
rspec-devel@...
>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel_______________________________________________
rspec-devel mailing list
rspec-devel@...
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
