Re: mock framework

>
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Jay Levitt wrote:
>
>> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>> I'd like to ditch rspec's mock framework and let ppl use mocha or
>>> flexmock or RR (or others). RSpec's mocking framework doesn't really
>>> offer anything above those frameworks, and it's therefore an
>>> unnecessary burden to maintain.
>> +1!  I currently use rspec's mocks because they're the default, but
>> I'd
>> have no problems switching frameworks.  If there's no good reason to
>> have our own, let's not have our own.
>>
>> Jay
>>
>
> +1, and +1 to moving things like Spec:UI and Spec:distributed. I
> would suggest keeping the literature on mocking, with minor
> modifications. The tight integration with mocking, and the pushing
> the ideas in the literature is what got my team and I to use it.  The
> current Rails literature really only shows mocks as a way to mock out
> an external project, but I think it is good to use it to isolate
> tests as well. I think that is proper BDD, too.
>
> JIm
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-devel mailing list
>> rspec-devel@...
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-devel mailing list
> rspec-devel@...
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel