hi chris, hi jack developers!
thanks for your mail. i'm forwarding it back to the list.
Chris Chafe wrote:
> Hi Jörn, Paul, Nando,
>
> Typing on behalf of myself and I'm sure also Juan-Pablo and Elie here at
> CCRMA, yes to the notion that Jörn suggests. A next evolutionary step
> would be to integrate features from these projects into one place.
>
> (I'm writing off-list because I'm not on the list -- thanks Nando for
> the forwarding the note.)
>
> One way to move forward would be an audio conference with all concerned
> -- meet each other and see where we're all at with this. Let me know if
> interested and if you think it effective to have the discussion more
> broadly with the list (or not).
paul certainly sounded like he was after immediate action (which would
be great imho!)
personally, i can't do much atm due to time restrictions, but if there
is interest, i'd try and work towards a "future of netjack" BOF session
at LAC 2010, maybe write a paper on the current status as a starting
point for discussion (with a feature wishlist and some design
constraints) and try to work out a way of moving forward and getting
testers and contributors (possibly some production professionals,
manufacturers or other people with commercial interest) onboard.
i agree with paul that (net)?jack(trip)? has all the signs of becoming
a killer app, and that there is high demand in the industry for
packet-switched but still low latency audio. seamless WAN integration
with CELT is bound to rock the house...
best,
jörn
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik
Audio and event engineer
Ambisonic surround recordings
http://stackingdwarves.net+49 177 7937487
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel@...
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
