
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's
security policy.
Dear Irv and Calendar People
From: East Carolina University Calendar
discussion List [mailto:CALNDR-L@...] On Behalf Of Irv
Bromberg
Sent: 18 March 2009 16:52
To: CALNDR-L@...
Subject: Re: new public beta of Kalendis released
On
2009.03.18, at 12:40 , Palmen, KEV (Karl) wrote:
I don’t think Irv
considered making the colour correspondence apply to the year number rather
than year of cycle number, then the colours in the symmetrical cycles would
flip between successive cycles.
Irv
replies: That is what I tried first, and was dismayed by the color
pattern flip between successive cycles, that is why I switched to
year-within-cycle and made sure that the first cycle at the epoch is always
shown. Fair
enough.
For the almost symmetrical
cycles the colours are anti-symmetrical, except for the middle year of the
cycle. Irv has shown only one of the two almost-symmetrical cycles for
each number C of years. He shows the one where the year C/2 is a leap
year and not the other one where year C/2 + 1 is a leap year.
Irv
replies: That is correct -- within Kalendis, I standardized on using
K=C/2 for even-length cycles, only because the arithmetic is a tad simpler.
Is there a better reason to pick K=C/2+1 instead?
No, but one should not forget that the K=C/2+1
cycle exists. It is the mirror image of the cycle shown.
Scanned by iCritical.