WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days. If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration on the Nabble Support forum. Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.

 « Return to Thread: normalizedString/input and string/textarea?

Re: normalizedString/input and string/textarea?

by John Boyer :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

Hi Alain,

xsd:string is the almost-right datatype, and so there has been no priority on doing better.
normalizedString does stuff to a string that we would not want.
The exact right datatype would be one pattern derived from string with the regex pattern [^\n] as the only thing input really says differently than textarea is single line input.

Cheers,
John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications
IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria
E-Mail: boyerj@...  

Blog:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Blog RSS feed:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw





From:        Alain Couthures <alain.couthures@...>
To:        "www-forms@..." <www-forms@...>
Date:        04/14/2011 09:03 AM
Subject:        normalizedString/input and string/textarea?
Sent by:        www-forms-request@...




Hello,

I'm still perplex about the differences between core forms input controls.

More specifically, if I want to edit an instance according to types, I
would consider that xsd:string is not correct for xf:input but for
xf:textarea.

It is obvious that the carriage return, line feed and tab characters
cannot be entered using xf:input but xf:textarea.

So, why isn't xsd:normalizedString the default type for xf:input?

Thank you very much for your answers!

Alain Couthures
<agenceXML>
http://www.agencexml.com/xsltforms




 « Return to Thread: normalizedString/input and string/textarea?