« Return to Thread: optional "function" keyword

Re: optional "function" keyword

by Brendan Eich-2 :: Rate this Message:

Just replied to Isaac on this. We run into the completion-value leak
objection and I do not see a way around it.

/be

David Herman wrote:

> On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>
>> Isaac Schlueter wrote:
>>
>>> Certainly, this is quite nice:
>>>
>>> myList.forEach((item) { .. })
>>
>> Less nice for map because of the hated six-letter keyword, but yeah.
>
> What if the anonymous form didn't require `return`, i.e., used the
> body's completion value?
>
> myList.map((x) { x + 1 })
>
> (Whether the body is TCP-respecting or not is an orthogonal question.)
>
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@...
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@...
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

« Return to Thread: optional "function" keyword