|
»
« Return to Thread: packager question... how do you like 32bit libs to be built ?
Re: packager question... how do you like 32bit libs to be built ?
by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
::
Rate this Message:
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 17:17 +0200, torbenh@... wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:54:07PM +0000, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 07:22 +0200, torbenh@... wrote:
> > > hi...
> > >
> > > for me its much more convenient, when the 32bit libjack is built and
> > > installed along with a normal 64bit build.
> > >
> > > i added this to the build scripts of jacknone.
> > >
> > > are there any concerns from packager side ?
> > > iE do you want a configure switch to turn this behaviour off ?
> > >
> > > please remind me of the different paths for 32bit libs on the different
> > > systems. so far the libdir32 is generated by appending 32 to the
> > > libdir64.
> >
> > 32 bits: /usr/lib
> > 64 bits: /usr/lib64
>
> is that really the case ? you need to build everything with
> LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 ?
In x86_64? Yes, at least in Fedora that is where 64 bit libraries land.
> i added a libdir32 switch now. should work for everybody.
>
> fernando, i need an answer to the first question though.
> does it make sense to you that when jack is built with --mixed it will
> also build a 32bit lib ?
Hmm, not for me. The "official" jack in Fedora in the 64 bit distro has
two packages, the 64 bit one and the 32 bit build as well. But that is
not a 32 bit library built while the 64 bit package is built.
> this 32bit lib is probably not the same as the normal 32bit lib.
> i am not sure how we should behave. stephane made --mixed a configure
> option, and even off by default.
>
> it only makes sense on a 64bit system. but it looks like packagers just
> use i386 builds as 32bit packages.
I think that is the case. What is the difference between that 32 bit
library and the one in --mixed? I have not idea...
> so
>
> a) jack x86_64 package conatains a 32bit lib.
> b) --mixed will be default, and you will be able to use the normal
> i386 library
I think it should not be the default (but I don't really understand what
it is).
> i just want that people who build from source have a sort of easy
> experiance, and the default on 64bit should be that the 32bit lib is
> installed along.
Probably not, at least in my case.
-- Fernando
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel@...
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:54:07PM +0000, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 07:22 +0200, torbenh@... wrote:
> > > hi...
> > >
> > > for me its much more convenient, when the 32bit libjack is built and
> > > installed along with a normal 64bit build.
> > >
> > > i added this to the build scripts of jacknone.
> > >
> > > are there any concerns from packager side ?
> > > iE do you want a configure switch to turn this behaviour off ?
> > >
> > > please remind me of the different paths for 32bit libs on the different
> > > systems. so far the libdir32 is generated by appending 32 to the
> > > libdir64.
> >
> > 32 bits: /usr/lib
> > 64 bits: /usr/lib64
>
> is that really the case ? you need to build everything with
> LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 ?
In x86_64? Yes, at least in Fedora that is where 64 bit libraries land.
> i added a libdir32 switch now. should work for everybody.
>
> fernando, i need an answer to the first question though.
> does it make sense to you that when jack is built with --mixed it will
> also build a 32bit lib ?
Hmm, not for me. The "official" jack in Fedora in the 64 bit distro has
two packages, the 64 bit one and the 32 bit build as well. But that is
not a 32 bit library built while the 64 bit package is built.
> this 32bit lib is probably not the same as the normal 32bit lib.
> i am not sure how we should behave. stephane made --mixed a configure
> option, and even off by default.
>
> it only makes sense on a 64bit system. but it looks like packagers just
> use i386 builds as 32bit packages.
I think that is the case. What is the difference between that 32 bit
library and the one in --mixed? I have not idea...
> so
>
> a) jack x86_64 package conatains a 32bit lib.
> b) --mixed will be default, and you will be able to use the normal
> i386 library
I think it should not be the default (but I don't really understand what
it is).
> i just want that people who build from source have a sort of easy
> experiance, and the default on 64bit should be that the 32bit lib is
> installed along.
Probably not, at least in my case.
-- Fernando
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel@...
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
« Return to Thread: packager question... how do you like 32bit libs to be built ?
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
