> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:31:30 -0400, Jeff Layton <
jlayton@...>
wrote:
>
> No. Is there some reason you feel the need to pretend that the
> directory is writable when it isn't?
Yes, because it is writable : my share are ALL WRITABLE for user (username
and uid
option that i pass during the mount). So 2.6.24 have FOR ME the correct
behaviour (perms). During my search i've also found that force the
dir_mode to 0000 solve partially my problem : writable, but only for
root...
Finally, the problem (often) come from microsoft : they use the read only
attribut instead of the system attribut. As they discuss in this page
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/256614 on readonly bit : "some programs can
display errors while trying to write file in this - fake readonly - dir".
Maybe the case with cifs in kernel 2.6.26 or later. I've tried the regedit
they proprosed and after reload cifs all my shares were mounted with
corrects
perms : rwxr-xr-x instead of r-x-r-xr-x.
So for the moment it works, hope for a long time ;) and thanks for
spending time to answer and to help !
_______________________________________________
linux-cifs-client mailing list
linux-cifs-client@...
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
