Hi Fred,
Here is your pong. Seems quiet sometimes indeed here, but it's
definitely not dead. Otherwise no ping pong, right. I actually bumped
into your next message regarding the "RAND", where you can't speak of
"free of charges" but being within the limits of reason ability. This
is not only the case here but anywhere you will look. Differentiation
is made and explained just under the link you gave where the RAND is
explained ("RF License").
Now getting into this I am wondering about your opinion about the first
formal objection:
http://www.w3.org/2001/08/ppwg-fo2-16July2001.html
Bastiaan
http://www.propertyalert.org
--
www.propertyalert.org
| Address: | Lindengracht 11, 1015 KB Amsterdam |
| Tel: | (+31) 614 280 951 |
| Fax: | (+31) 877 844 461 |
=================================================================
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd
voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt, wordt u verzocht de
inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
=================================================================
The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be
exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do
not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by returning this e-mail.
