On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, nescivi <
nescivi@...> wrote:
> It's been like this since more or less the original port to Linux by sk.
*insert embarrased emoticon here* :)
> I doubt that this would be succesful, seeing that on Linux people prefer to
> use a text editor they already know and use the interface with those to do
> their SC work.
> Linux people like variety and modular approaches; and at this stage you'd have
> to come with a completely customisable and fully fledged IDE, which takes
> long to develop....
Good point... I was thinking of the challenges bringing new users up
to speed with user experiences that are quite different depending on
platform. But if there isn't sufficient demand (i.e. Mac users have
little incentive to switch, and Linux users have reasons to prefer a
modular architecture) then I would agree that the better approach is
to improve the user experience in Psycollider.
hjh
--
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
jamshark70@...
http://www.dewdrop-world.net"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal." -- Whitman
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list
info (subscribe and unsubscribe):
http://swiki.hfbk-hamburg.de:8888/MusicTechnology/880archive:
http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/search:
http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
