|
« Return to Thread: Work Progress
Re: pwgl-users: XML import/export
by padovani
::
Rate this Message:
Dear list, Hans, Jacopo,
I suggest that this mail-list and the PWGL development would gain more
users/partners, libraries and extensions if it its sources were opened
so that people can feel confident that they are working and helping to
develop something that is supported by a wider community. Personally,
I'm not an advocate of FLOSS by ideological reasons, but one can see
that the communities of languages and applications like Pure Data, Super
Collider, Lilypond, CM/CLM/Snd, Processing are very active in helping
others to get started with these tools and also in developing extensions
and libraries.
In my point of view, the PWGL community is still too small to give
financial support to its developers, maybe it would be a better approach
to expand the base of users and developers first.
I'm sorry if this suggestion is naive or impracticable, as I am not
aware about what the main developers would think about that and in which
context do they develop this incredible composition environmet. Anyway,
it seems that open-source applications count with a great support of
users with or without a financial aid (to do things like the XML
import/export, for example).
What do you think?
josé henrique padovani
Jacopo Baboni Schilingi escreveu:
> Dear Hans, I'm also very interesting in launch again a financial
> participation for XML import/export.
> Personally I suggest to try once more this call for financial
> contribution.
> I hope that could be a solution for all of us.
>
> All my best
>
> --
>
> Jacopo Baboni Schilingi
>
>> WHAT SHOULD WE DO????
>>
>> Has anybody a good idea of a scenario?
>>
>> Should we launch the call for financial contribution again to collect
>> the total of 1000 Euro?
>> Would more users be willing to contribute this time? (the first call
>> got only something like 350 Euro).
>>
>> Any ideas are welcome.
>>
>>
>> thanks, Hans
>>
>>
>>
>--
http://zepadovani.info
I suggest that this mail-list and the PWGL development would gain more
users/partners, libraries and extensions if it its sources were opened
so that people can feel confident that they are working and helping to
develop something that is supported by a wider community. Personally,
I'm not an advocate of FLOSS by ideological reasons, but one can see
that the communities of languages and applications like Pure Data, Super
Collider, Lilypond, CM/CLM/Snd, Processing are very active in helping
others to get started with these tools and also in developing extensions
and libraries.
In my point of view, the PWGL community is still too small to give
financial support to its developers, maybe it would be a better approach
to expand the base of users and developers first.
I'm sorry if this suggestion is naive or impracticable, as I am not
aware about what the main developers would think about that and in which
context do they develop this incredible composition environmet. Anyway,
it seems that open-source applications count with a great support of
users with or without a financial aid (to do things like the XML
import/export, for example).
What do you think?
josé henrique padovani
Jacopo Baboni Schilingi escreveu:
> Dear Hans, I'm also very interesting in launch again a financial
> participation for XML import/export.
> Personally I suggest to try once more this call for financial
> contribution.
> I hope that could be a solution for all of us.
>
> All my best
>
> --
>
> Jacopo Baboni Schilingi
>
>> WHAT SHOULD WE DO????
>>
>> Has anybody a good idea of a scenario?
>>
>> Should we launch the call for financial contribution again to collect
>> the total of 1000 Euro?
>> Would more users be willing to contribute this time? (the first call
>> got only something like 350 Euro).
>>
>> Any ideas are welcome.
>>
>>
>> thanks, Hans
>>
>>
>>
>
http://zepadovani.info
« Return to Thread: Work Progress
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
