wclapham wrote:
> If a filter field is not found in the source database, is it supposed to
> cause mapnik to abort rendering that entire layer? or should it just ignore
> that filter and move on to the next?
That's how it currently works, yes. You're not the first to be bitten by
it, and there's also already a ticket for this, but not much has been
done there, yet.
http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/242--
Lennard
_______________________________________________
Mapnik-users mailing list
Mapnik-users@...
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users