« Return to Thread: Re: release 3.2.1

Re: release 3.2.1

by Robert T. Short :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Is there to be no comment on this at all?  Both Daniel and I have made
the same comments for the same reasons and probably because we have both
experienced problems like this before.  It isn't that Jaroslav is doing
a bad job, but rather that the process (or rather lack of process) is
guaranteed to have significant problems.

Bob

>
> I think to support the branching paradigm we need a better organized
> team, possibly more bug reporting / tracking tools, and some type of
> beta schedule.  One has to resist the desire to get new features to
> market ASAP, and instead set versions aside so that the whole group
> can test-run the version over a month.  Just let the developers site
> know there is a new release candidate for beta testing.  Any bugs
> could then be entered into a bug tracker (which we don't have) for the
> particular version.  Without that, one or two release versions, a
> developer version...and soon it is too much for any one person to keep
> track of.  If it were a smaller project, perhaps, but not one this size.
>
> Also, there are certain hunks of code that are "tricky programming"
> and should be modified only long before a release.  unwind_protect is
> one of those.  Stacks, recursions, interrupts, and such have a lot of
> paths and conditions that are easy to overlook.
>
> Dan
>
>

 « Return to Thread: Re: release 3.2.1