« Return to Thread: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!

Re: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!

by Ron Johnson :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

On 2009-07-20 21:29, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 19 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 2009-07-08 20:23, Miles Bader wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Hmm, my / is 290MB, though /tmp, /var, /boot, and /usr are all separate
>>> partitions.
>> *Why*?  IOW, what benefit do you derive in 2009 (as opposed to 1989,
>> when disks weren't always large enough to hold it all) from splitting
>> these out?
>
>         Security?
>
> /dev/sdb2 / ext3 noatime,errors=remount-ro 0 1

Why device names instead of labels or UUIDs?

> /dev/sda1 /boot ext3 noatime,rw,defaults,noauto 0 2

noauto?????

> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-usr_lv /usr ext3 noatime,ro,defaults 0 2

I understand why this is ro; why then is /boot rw?

> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-home_lv /home ext3 noatime,rw,nosuid,nodev 0 2

What does nodev mean?  (My google fu must be lacking.)  Is "Do not
interpret character or block special devices on the file system."
just extra security so that a rogue app doesn't try to create a
device file anywhere but /dev?

> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-ulocal_lv /usr/local ext3 noatime,rw,nosuid,nodev 0 2
> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-var_lv /var ext3 noatime,rw,nosuid               0 2
> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-spool_lv /var/spool ext3 noatime,rw,nosuid,nodev 0 2

Seems to me that this whole exercise is to ensure that /dev is in
it's own partition.

--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

 « Return to Thread: resize2fs: Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!