>Wow. So I'm not hallucinating (at least not this time :)
>Been seeing this, haven't had a chance to track it down. Looking at
>exmh's .xmhcache files, I have 145,141 total messages listed in
>.xmhcache entries, and the bug is affecting 3,266 of them. So there's
>an anectodal value for the= frequency.
Could someone forw me one of the affected messages? I'll be glad to track
it down. Also, if you could include an MD5/SHA1 checksum of the message
I can be sure on this end to recreate it exactly?