« Return to Thread: sctwitt
Hmm, I thought that was changed a while back, but maybe not. Change
"clip2" to "clip2(1)", it seems to need a default value...
2009/3/27, Sharopolis <sharopolis@...>:
-->
>
> {l=(DelayC.ar(Rotate2.ar(*LocalIn.ar(2)++0.2),1.7,1.7)+SoundIn.ar.round(0.04)*1.2).clip2;LocalOut.ar(BPF.ar(l));l*0.1}.play//
>
> This code is fantastic Dan, but I can only get it to work if I get rid of
> the clip2 method.
>
>
> I'm running the 3.3 RC
>
> Here's the error I get,
>
>
> ERROR: binary operator 'clip2' failed.
> RECEIVER:
> nil
> ARGS:
> Instance of Array { (10838820, gc=80, fmt=01, flg=00, set=01)
> indexed slots [2]
> 0 : instance of BinaryOpUGen (1224CC10, size=8, set=3)
> 1 : instance of BinaryOpUGen (1224CCD0, size=8, set=3)
> }
> nil
> CALL STACK:
> DoesNotUnderstandError:reportError 1224CA90
> arg this = <instance of BinaryOpFailureError>
> Nil:handleError 1224C7F0
> arg this = nil
> arg error = <instance of BinaryOpFailureError>
> Thread:handleError 1224B950
> arg this = <instance of Thread>
> arg error = <instance of BinaryOpFailureError>
> Object:throw 1224B650
> arg this = <instance of BinaryOpFailureError>
> Function:protect 1224B4D0
> arg this = <instance of Function>
> arg handler = <instance of Function>
> var result = <instance of BinaryOpFailureError>
> SynthDef:build 1292D510
> arg this = <instance of SynthDef>
> arg ugenGraphFunc = <instance of Function>
> arg rates = nil
> arg prependArgs = nil
> Function:play 1292D3D0
> arg this = <instance of Function>
> arg target = <instance of Group>
> arg outbus = 0
> arg fadeTime = 0.02
> arg addAction = 'addToHead'
> arg args = nil
> var def = nil
> var synth = nil
> var server = <instance of Server>
> var bytes = nil
> var synthMsg = nil
> Interpreter:interpretPrintCmdLine 1292D0B0
> arg this = <instance of Interpreter>
> var res = nil
> var func = <instance of Function>
> var code = "{l=(DelayC.ar(Rotate2.ar(*Lo..."
> Process:interpretPrintCmdLine 1224B350
> arg this = <instance of Main>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Dan Stowell <danstowell@...> wrote:
> >
> > 2009/3/27, '2+ <electriclightheads@...>:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > hey http://twitter.com/mclduk !
> > > you wanted to report about this by yourself? but i couldn't help
> > > myself posting here...
> > >
> > > i found you doing sctwitt
> > > this is great ..
> >
> > The hard 140-character limit is an interesting challenge. Kind of like
> > writing haiku for sc...
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sc-users mailing list
> >
> > info (subscription, etc.):
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> > archive:
> http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> > search:
> http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Why not SuperCollide on over to my SuperColliding Blog? It's about
> SuperCollider!
> http://superdupercollider.blogspot.com/
>
http://www.mcld.co.uk
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
« Return to Thread: sctwitt
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |