« Return to Thread: selectively disabling atime updates?

Re: selectively disabling atime updates?

by Paul Goyette :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:

>>>>> How about using fss for it instead.
>>>> 1. fss is still marked experimental.
>>> oh, I have overlooked that.
>>>
>>>> 2. does fss work with WAPL at all?
>>> I don't know that.
>>
>> It seems to work for me!  All my FS are WAPBL-enabled, and I always
>> use backup -X for snapshot.
>
> rsync from a snapshot wouldn't work for me on sparc-64 with an
> oldish kernel (5.99.something). I must setup one of the slower
> machines for at least partial tests, because the main one is
> the file server...
>
> Paul, what's your architecture and version?

I'm completely amd64 here, and currently running 6.99.5


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:       |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com    |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer |                          | pgoyette at netbsd.org  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 « Return to Thread: selectively disabling atime updates?