On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Dasn <
dasn@...> wrote:
> Now I can see that...we are totally misunderstanding each other. It's my
> fault not to point out the problem clearly.
> In the 'send_file' function, I found it sends each line + '\0' + '\n' to
> the pipe, (I think it's a bug), and the sendmail can happily accept it,
> while other MTAs will report an error. So your idea about Cc: to a local
> user will not reveal this problem, because the outputs to the pipe by
> 'sendbug' will be processed (masked) by sendmail. So the copy of local
> user is not the same what 'sendbug' writes to the pipe.
Thanks for reporting the bug, a fix for this and another bug was committed.
> Please note that I am not meaning adding this feature is in order to
> only test the function, it's just an involuntary-side of this feature.
> Originally, IMHO, sendbug will be better if only produce its raw PR mail
> file for users, and let the users decide how to send it (use sendmail or
> others), that is why I suggested the PR_AGENT feature.
I still don't think this should be added, sorry.
-Ray-
