On 3/20/07, Colm MacCarthaigh <
colm@...> wrote:
> Also, why do you undefine the generics atomics defines? they exist
> for a reason!
On 3/20/07, Colm MacCarthaigh <
colm@...> wrote:
> Also, why do you undefine the generics atomics defines? they exist
> for a reason!
#if defined(SOLARIS2) && ((SOLARIS2 + 0) >= 10)
#include <atomic.h>
#if defined(USE_GENERIC_ATOMICS)
#undef USE_GENERIC_ATOMICS
#endif
If i am in Solaris >= 10 and i have the Solaris atomics, do i want to
still need the generic atomics ?
> Your patch also seems to be a diff against a httpd source tree, and
> includes httpd-specific code. This is dev@apr, please use it only for
> APR code, and it's best to submit patches against trunk , *not* whatever
> httpd happens to ship :-)
yes it is against 2.2.4.
when i sent the original patch for the atomics to httpd@, a couple
months ago, i was told to send it to apr@, because "this was an apr
patch".
;-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.teleman@...
