« Return to Thread: should we use bazaar?
Re: should we use bazaar?
by Jason Dillon
::
Rate this Message:
This has been very interesting to follow, though I'm still a bit lost
as to which of these DVCS has the *best* support for working with an
existing SVN server to share branches. Seems like GIT should, but I
just installed the macport and there is no 'git-svn' commands, bzr
might be next, as it looks like the hgsvn stuff is still not very
mature (ie. can't commit back).
Anyone know?
--jason
On Jul 2, 2008, at 12:00 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:38 +0200, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
>> I think it is a bit strange.. int the days of cvs you almost never
>> had
>> free cvs server. cvsdude is the only one I know. Anyway, if this goes
>> through Codehaus for example, then the user of course still needs
>> access
>> to the server... I think I like the idea to use the mailing list to
>> handle patches and automatically merge after voting much better.
>
> In which case we could ask the Bazaar people whether the Codehaus
> people
> could run Patch Queue Manager and Bundle Buggy, assuming the Codehaus
> people are going to run Bazaar of course !
>
> Of course there is an assumption here of using Bazaar. I am not
> sure if
> Mercurial has anything equivalent. I suspect Git does not, but I am
> guessing.
>
> --
> Russel.
> ====================================================
> Dr Russel Winder Partner
>
> Concertant LLP t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203
> 41 Buckmaster Road, f: +44 8700 516 084
> London SW11 1EN, UK. m: +44 7770 465 077
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
as to which of these DVCS has the *best* support for working with an
existing SVN server to share branches. Seems like GIT should, but I
just installed the macport and there is no 'git-svn' commands, bzr
might be next, as it looks like the hgsvn stuff is still not very
mature (ie. can't commit back).
Anyone know?
--jason
On Jul 2, 2008, at 12:00 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:38 +0200, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
>> I think it is a bit strange.. int the days of cvs you almost never
>> had
>> free cvs server. cvsdude is the only one I know. Anyway, if this goes
>> through Codehaus for example, then the user of course still needs
>> access
>> to the server... I think I like the idea to use the mailing list to
>> handle patches and automatically merge after voting much better.
>
> In which case we could ask the Bazaar people whether the Codehaus
> people
> could run Patch Queue Manager and Bundle Buggy, assuming the Codehaus
> people are going to run Bazaar of course !
>
> Of course there is an assumption here of using Bazaar. I am not
> sure if
> Mercurial has anything equivalent. I suspect Git does not, but I am
> guessing.
>
> --
> Russel.
> ====================================================
> Dr Russel Winder Partner
>
> Concertant LLP t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203
> 41 Buckmaster Road, f: +44 8700 516 084
> London SW11 1EN, UK. m: +44 7770 465 077
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
« Return to Thread: should we use bazaar?
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
