definitely, I just wrote this mail 4 days ago but sent it to the wrong
address and by the time I re-sent it the other thred had appeared :)
2009/7/17 Detering Dirk <
Dirk.Detering@...>:
>> The second I guess would be the more correct but it forces
>> client side import. Ideally, one should be able to abstract
>> it away, e.g.
>>
>> doto(x) { //no additional boilerplate
>> foo(1) // calls x.foo(1)
>> bar(2) // calls x.bar(2)
>> }
>
>
> Hmmm. That would allow for the following?
>
> class MyClass {
>
> def someMethod(f: =>Unit) {
> doto(this) f
> }
>
> def otherMethod() { ... }
> }
>
> val x = new MyClass()
>
> x.someMethod {
> otherMethod()
> }
>
>
> If yes, that would be the answer (or better: it is the same question)
> for thread "Question on DSL", because that resembles the Groovy
> closure delegate feature. It would be great for creating
> builder based DSLs.
>
> KR
> Det
>
--
blog en:
http://www.riffraff.infoblog it:
http://riffraff.blogsome.com
