Chris Cannam wrote:
> I've committed a different fix, because pairs < pairsNow (but >= 0) is
> actually supposed to be legitimate for this function. But it will
> need some further investigation (I've left in a warning).
Thank you for that: I didn't spot the code that removes excess
subMasterOutputs. Anyway, your fix indeed works for me, and I see the
warning too.
Colin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel