Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)

> +1 (not only non-binding, but with considerable conflict of interest, since
> I'm the one badgering Howard et. al. to have this happen ;)
>
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote:
>
>  Looking to apply the patch in this ticket; I can apply it to trunk, but it
>> looks like there's also a strong sentiment in favor of applying the patch to
>> the 5.1 release, as well (and, eventually, releasing  5.1.0.6). Any qualms
>> with me making a 5.1.0.6 branch based on the 5.1.0.5 release?
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>
>>
> Christian Edward Gruber
> christianedwardgruber@...
> http://www.geekinasuit.com/
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>
>