I will agree with you on the semantics. I am going to revert my changes
(back to testdwr.war). I am going to search/replace all test-dwr
instances with testdwr. Will that do for now?
Mike Wilson wrote:
> David Marginian wrote on den 7 april 2009 14:00:
>
>> Do you have the latest build.xml file for each project? I am pretty
>> sure I updated both of them.
>>
>
> Ah, right... :-), I hadn't updated my testdwr project. Sorry.
>
>
>> A number of tests were failing due to:
>>
>> public Verify checkContext()
>> {
>> ServerContext serverContext = ServerContextFactory.get();
>> Container container = serverContext.getContainer();
>> Verify verify = new Verify();
>>
>> verify.equals("ContextPath", "/test-dwr",
>>
>
> Ah yes, now I remember seeing this (and reacting on the name syntax)
> some time ago.
>
>
>> Perhaps we should
>> revert my change and change the checkContext method to check
>> for testdwr
>> not test-dwr. I agree that semantically that would be more proper.
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> I think virtually every person that pops testdwr.war into an app
> server will be surprised that it fails when mounted on the default
> context path (== war-filename excl extension).
>
> I don't have a strong opinion on whether the name should have a dash
> or not, but I would like the following artifacts and configurations
> to use the same string:
> - svn base directory
> - eclipse project name
> - main artifact filename
> - expected context path (do we really need to test against this?)
>
> This means we either need to change expected context path and war
> filename, or svn base dir and eclipse project name.
>
> Best regards
> Mike
>
>
>> Thanks
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> I saw that you renamed testdwr.war to test-dwr.war in dwr's
>>>
>> build.xml.
>>
>>> This needs to be in sync with testdwr:build.xml, and as the
>>>
>> mentioned
>>
>>> war file is the main artifact of the testdwr project I would suggest
>>> to keep SVN base directory, project name, and this filename
>>>
>> the same.
>>
>>> Probably that means that we should go back to testdwr.war.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...