> I will agree with you on the semantics. I am going to revert my
> changes (back to testdwr.war). I am going to search/replace all
> test-dwr instances with testdwr. Will that do for now?
> Mike Wilson wrote:
>> David Marginian wrote on den 7 april 2009 14:00:
>>
>>> Do you have the latest build.xml file for each project? I am pretty
>>> sure I updated both of them.
>>
>> Ah, right... :-), I hadn't updated my testdwr project. Sorry.
>>
>>
>>> A number of tests were failing due to:
>>>
>>> public Verify checkContext()
>>> {
>>> ServerContext serverContext = ServerContextFactory.get();
>>> Container container = serverContext.getContainer();
>>> Verify verify = new Verify();
>>>
>>> verify.equals("ContextPath", "/test-dwr",
>>
>> Ah yes, now I remember seeing this (and reacting on the name syntax)
>> some time ago.
>>
>>
>>> Perhaps we should revert my change and change the checkContext
>>> method to check for testdwr not test-dwr. I agree that semantically
>>> that would be more proper. Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> I think virtually every person that pops testdwr.war into an app
>> server will be surprised that it fails when mounted on the default
>> context path (== war-filename excl extension).
>>
>> I don't have a strong opinion on whether the name should have a dash
>> or not, but I would like the following artifacts and configurations
>> to use the same string:
>> - svn base directory
>> - eclipse project name
>> - main artifact filename
>> - expected context path (do we really need to test against this?)
>>
>> This means we either need to change expected context path and war
>> filename, or svn base dir and eclipse project name.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>>> David,
>>>>
>>>> I saw that you renamed testdwr.war to test-dwr.war in dwr's
>>> build.xml.
>>>> This needs to be in sync with testdwr:build.xml, and as the
>>> mentioned
>>>
>>>> war file is the main artifact of the testdwr project I would suggest
>>>> to keep SVN base directory, project name, and this filename
>>> the same.
>>>
>>>> Probably that means that we should go back to testdwr.war.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>
>