I don't think so. Naming conventions are important and if we get lax
rolling is to not let it form in the first place. It was sloppy and I
made the change in haste to get it working.
> I'm perfectly happy with that. And, oh, I didn't mention it
> before but I do realize that all this belongs to the nit-
> picking category ;-).
>
> Best regards
> Mike
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Marginian [mailto:
david@...]
>> Sent: den 7 april 2009 15:10
>> To:
dev@...
>> Subject: Re: [dwr-dev] testdwr.war vs test-dwr.war
>>
>> I will agree with you on the semantics. I am going to revert
>> my changes
>> (back to testdwr.war). I am going to search/replace all test-dwr
>> instances with testdwr. Will that do for now?
>>
>> Mike Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> David Marginian wrote on den 7 april 2009 14:00:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Do you have the latest build.xml file for each project? I
>>>>
>> am pretty
>>
>>>> sure I updated both of them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ah, right... :-), I hadn't updated my testdwr project. Sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> A number of tests were failing due to:
>>>>
>>>> public Verify checkContext()
>>>> {
>>>> ServerContext serverContext = ServerContextFactory.get();
>>>> Container container = serverContext.getContainer();
>>>> Verify verify = new Verify();
>>>>
>>>> verify.equals("ContextPath", "/test-dwr",
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ah yes, now I remember seeing this (and reacting on the name syntax)
>>> some time ago.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Perhaps we should
>>>> revert my change and change the checkContext method to check
>>>> for testdwr
>>>> not test-dwr. I agree that semantically that would be
>>>>
>> more proper.
>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I think virtually every person that pops testdwr.war into an app
>>> server will be surprised that it fails when mounted on the default
>>> context path (== war-filename excl extension).
>>>
>>> I don't have a strong opinion on whether the name should have a dash
>>> or not, but I would like the following artifacts and configurations
>>> to use the same string:
>>> - svn base directory
>>> - eclipse project name
>>> - main artifact filename
>>> - expected context path (do we really need to test against this?)
>>>
>>> This means we either need to change expected context path and war
>>> filename, or svn base dir and eclipse project name.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mike Wilson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> I saw that you renamed testdwr.war to test-dwr.war in dwr's
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> build.xml.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> This needs to be in sync with testdwr:build.xml, and as the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> mentioned
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> war file is the main artifact of the testdwr project I
>>>>>
>> would suggest
>>
>>>>> to keep SVN base directory, project name, and this filename
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> the same.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Probably that means that we should go back to testdwr.war.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>
>
>