« Return to Thread: testdwr.war vs test-dwr.war

Re: testdwr.war vs test-dwr.war

by davidmarginian :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

I don't think so.  Naming conventions are important and if we get lax
here that laxness will spread - best way to stop the snowball from
rolling is to not let it form in the first place.  It was sloppy and I
made the change in haste to get it working.

Mike Wilson wrote:

> I'm perfectly happy with that. And, oh, I didn't mention it
> before but I do realize that all this belongs to the nit-
> picking category ;-).
>
> Best regards
> Mike
>
>  
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Marginian [mailto:david@...]
>> Sent: den 7 april 2009 15:10
>> To: dev@...
>> Subject: Re: [dwr-dev] testdwr.war vs test-dwr.war
>>
>> I will agree with you on the semantics.  I am going to revert
>> my changes
>> (back to testdwr.war).  I am going to search/replace all test-dwr
>> instances with testdwr.  Will that do for now?
>>
>> Mike Wilson wrote:
>>    
>>> David Marginian wrote on den 7 april 2009 14:00:
>>>  
>>>      
>>>> Do you have the latest build.xml file for each project?  I
>>>>        
>> am pretty
>>    
>>>> sure I updated both of them.  
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>> Ah, right... :-), I hadn't updated my testdwr project. Sorry.
>>>
>>>  
>>>      
>>>> A number of tests were failing due to:
>>>>
>>>>  public Verify checkContext()
>>>>     {
>>>>         ServerContext serverContext = ServerContextFactory.get();
>>>>         Container container = serverContext.getContainer();
>>>>         Verify verify = new Verify();
>>>>
>>>>         verify.equals("ContextPath", "/test-dwr",
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>> Ah yes, now I remember seeing this (and reacting on the name syntax)
>>> some time ago.
>>>
>>>  
>>>      
>>>> Perhaps we should
>>>> revert my change and change the checkContext method to check
>>>> for testdwr
>>>> not test-dwr.  I agree that semantically that would be
>>>>        
>> more proper.  
>>    
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>> I think virtually every person that pops testdwr.war into an app
>>> server will be surprised that it fails when mounted on the default
>>> context path (== war-filename excl extension).
>>>
>>> I don't have a strong opinion on whether the name should have a dash
>>> or not, but I would like the following artifacts and configurations
>>> to use the same string:
>>> - svn base directory
>>> - eclipse project name
>>> - main artifact filename
>>> - expected context path (do we really need to test against this?)
>>>
>>> This means we either need to change expected context path and war
>>> filename, or svn base dir and eclipse project name.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>  
>>>      
>>>> Thanks
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mike Wilson wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> I saw that you renamed testdwr.war to test-dwr.war in dwr's
>>>>>      
>>>>>          
>>>> build.xml.
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>>>> This needs to be in sync with testdwr:build.xml, and as the
>>>>>      
>>>>>          
>>>> mentioned
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>>>> war file is the main artifact of the testdwr project I
>>>>>          
>> would suggest
>>    
>>>>> to keep SVN base directory, project name, and this filename
>>>>>      
>>>>>          
>>>> the same.
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>>>> Probably that means that we should go back to testdwr.war.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      
>>>>>          
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>      
>>>>>          
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>>>
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>>      
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>      
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>
>>    
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>
>
>  


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

 « Return to Thread: testdwr.war vs test-dwr.war