Hello Behcet,
On 11/4/2011 9:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> I am confused about all these very high level, intelligent looking
> comments, and I must say I am fed up with them :-).
- I'm guessing you don't wish to restrict to only stupid comments.
- Do you mean that only low-level comments are of interest?
That doesn't seem appropriate in response to the proposal to
shut down the working group...?
> Non-tunneled communications is already there in DMM. You connect to the
> nearest HA and all new communications is non-tunneled.
That doesn't provide IP address continuity, does it?
> Do we agree that we should differentiate client-based and network based
> protocols and discuss them in different places?
If I understand your point, this is the status quo, right?
> or even there is no issue for one.
I did not understand the point of that.
> I think this is what we should decide now.
I'm not sure what "this" means in your sentence.
Regards,
Charlie P.
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
