|
View:
New views
1 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Re: toString() conventionI think that Spring's formatting conventions are pretty nice. What
does get put into string would be a matter of common sense. Regards, Alan On Jul 7, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Agreed. What I was thinking was what kind of debug info? For > example, do we print the class name? What about array/map members? > > > Regards, > Alan > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Simone Bordet" <simone.bordet@...> > To: dev@... > Sent: 7/7/2008 9:20 AM > Subject: Re: [livetribe-dev] toString() convention > > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Alan Cabrera <adc@...> > wrote: >> I know that this might be a fussy topic but I think that we should >> have >> standards on what gets printed in toString(). >> >> Thoughts? > > Well, this is my take: I use toString() for debugging purposes and > that's it. > If I want to stringify an object I usually add a new method, most of > the times called "asString" that stringifies the object as needed by > the business requirements (see Attributes.asString()). > > I don't want to rely on toString(), because it happened to me that I > overrode toString() to return a particular string (that was indeed > representing the object) needed by the business; then discovered that > the information returned was not enough when I was printing the object > in debug statements, so I modified toString() to return the additional > information, but this of course broke the place where toString() was > used as a business method. > > There is also another good reason to avoid toString() to become a > business method: it messes up with interfaces, see for example > o.l.slp.spi.filter.Filter. If toString() is used instead of > asString(), then you're not anymore forced to implement it (because it > is automatically implemented in Object). Bad for IDEs (that do not > show you that you *must* implement it). > > So my rule is: don't use toString() as a business method; otherwise, I > don't care how it is implemented. > > Simon > -- > http://bordet.blogspot.com > --- > Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are, > to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability, > the implementation technique must be flawless. Victoria Livschitz > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |