Hi Fabrizio,
http://jira.magnolia.info/browse/MAGNOLIA-1853Feel free to comment ;)
g
On Nov 15, 2007, at 22:32 , Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 10:18 PM, Grégory Joseph <
dev-list@...>
> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 15, 2007, at 21:39 , Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
>> I thought I did, and moved the implementation accordingly: the
>> alternative is ModuleLifecycle.start(). See the CacheModule class,
>> for instance. [1]
>
> there are two important thinks missing:
> - the automatic handling of a global save/rollback
> - the ability to use "normal" update tasks that you can also use in a
> module upgrade. If the sample you were referring at is the static
> AddCacheVoterTask.addVoter() that is definitively only an hack, not
> anything really usable.
>
> So, I would be glad to agree that this kind of tasks could fit well in
> a ModuleLifecycle implementation, but please rollback that change
> until there is a real alternative that fulfill those needs please.
> Mark the method with a clear "this will be moved somewhere else soon",
> but put it back...
>
>
> fabrizio
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> for list details see
>
http://documentation.magnolia.info/docs/en/editor/stayupdated.html> ----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://documentation.magnolia.info/docs/en/editor/stayupdated.html----------------------------------------------------------------