Hi Matej,
> Question is, how many of those users actually use generified wicket on
> day-to-day basis.
well, I did, and it really doesn't looked nice (and it doesn't work as it should
in the end, but that's another story).
The main point is (repeatedly) ignored by the people who are 'pro' generics:
Why do you have to put generics on Components, when need is only in a fraction
of cases?
Discussing the possibility of <Void> is somewhat an obscure workaround. It's
just boilerplate in more than 70% (of my cases), and this boilerplate gets
repeated over and over again with each assignment.
Best regards, --- Jan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...
