Re: using non-http transport protocol

[melshami]

Hi Jean,

Thank you for replying. Grizzy looks like the way to go although I am not that familiar with it. I was also considering JCA TCP/IP adapter.

from:http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=365887&tstart=0#365887

>Is your protocol TCP based or UDP based? If TCP, you can probably uses Grizzly's Port Unification mechanism (high level description)
>
    * http://is.gd/3KGTL

    Depending on the version of GlassFish you are using (v2 or v3), it can
    be pretty simple to implement. If that's what you are looking for, let's
    have the discussion under:
>
>

 The protocol is going to be TCP yes, and I am using GlassFish v2 and considering v3 in the future. I need to get my hands on Grizzly and try it out. But I have 3 questions here:

1- How does Grizzly works on the top of GlassFish?

2- Does it make use of clustering and load balancing of GlasFish server?

3- Any limitations in terms of performance and maximum number of concurrent requests?

Regards,
Mohamed

[Jeanfrancois Arcand-2]

Salut,

melshami wrote:

> Hi Jean,
>
> Thank you for replying. Grizzy looks like the way to go although I am not
> that familiar with it. I was also considering JCA TCP/IP adapter.
>
> from:http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=365887&tstart=0#365887
>
>> Is your protocol TCP based or UDP based? If TCP, you can probably uses
> Grizzly's Port Unification mechanism (high level description)
>     * http://is.gd/3KGTL
>
>     Depending on the version of GlassFish you are using (v2 or v3), it can
>     be pretty simple to implement. If that's what you are looking for, let's
>     have the discussion under:
>>
>
>  The protocol is going to be TCP yes, and I am using GlassFish v3. I need to
> get my hands on Grizzly and try it out. But I have 3 questions here:
>
> 1- How does Grizzly works on the top of GlassFish?

GlassFish run on top of Grizzly, and a Grizzly "micro" kernel has been
build to allow v3 runtime to be extended using Grizzly extension point.
  :-) All extensions point Grizzly allow can also be deployed in GlassFish.


>
> 2- Does it make use of clustering and load balancing of GlasFish server?

GF v3 doesn't have yet a clustering solution. mod_jk/proxy and Apache 2
is recommended.


>
> 3- Any limitations in terms of performance and maximum number of concurrent
> requests?

Not that I'm aware of, but I what are you planning to do exactly?

Thanks

-- Jeanfrancois

>
> Regards,
> Mohamed

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...

[melshami]

Hi Jeanfrancois,

I thought Shoal is a clustering solution for GlassFish, maybe not GlassFish v3 though.

The requirement for the server is to deal with at least 5000 concurrent requests.

Thanks again,
Mohamed

Jeanfrancois Arcand-2 wrote:

Salut,

melshami wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> Thank you for replying. Grizzy looks like the way to go although I am not
> that familiar with it. I was also considering JCA TCP/IP adapter.
>
> from:http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=365887&tstart=0#365887
>
>> Is your protocol TCP based or UDP based? If TCP, you can probably uses
> Grizzly's Port Unification mechanism (high level description)
>     * http://is.gd/3KGTL
>
>     Depending on the version of GlassFish you are using (v2 or v3), it can
>     be pretty simple to implement. If that's what you are looking for, let's
>     have the discussion under:
>>
>
>  The protocol is going to be TCP yes, and I am using GlassFish v3. I need to
> get my hands on Grizzly and try it out. But I have 3 questions here:
>
> 1- How does Grizzly works on the top of GlassFish?

GlassFish run on top of Grizzly, and a Grizzly "micro" kernel has been
build to allow v3 runtime to be extended using Grizzly extension point.
  :-) All extensions point Grizzly allow can also be deployed in GlassFish.


>
> 2- Does it make use of clustering and load balancing of GlasFish server?

GF v3 doesn't have yet a clustering solution. mod_jk/proxy and Apache 2
is recommended.


>
> 3- Any limitations in terms of performance and maximum number of concurrent
> requests?

Not that I'm aware of, but I what are you planning to do exactly?

Thanks

-- Jeanfrancois

>
> Regards,
> Mohamed

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [e-mail]
For additional commands, e-mail: [e-mail]