On Feb 20, 2012, at 9:41 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2012, at 23:21, S.M. Protsman wrote:
>
>> The 'provides' option shows that it comes from ruby19. Any idea why this isn't libruby.1.9.3.dylib and libruby.1.9.3-static.a?
>
> There's no reason why the library version number should match the program version number. Usually they don't match.
>
Okay. I wonder if this problem would vanish if the vim and MacVim ports allowed for variants according to the different ruby versions. They do this for python, but not for ruby.
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@...
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users